Washington Retirement Division

Washington QDRO

Washington is a community-property state with most public-employee retirement systems administered under one DRS umbrella. Plan 1 / Plan 2 / Plan 3 distinctions drive the drafting. Seattle and a few other cities run their own systems outside DRS.

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions from attorneys and divorcing parties.

How does Washington community property law apply to retirement?

Washington is a community-property state. Retirement contributions, earnings, and benefit accruals during marriage are community property, owned equally by both spouses. The default treatment is equal division. Pre-marital and post-separation accruals are separate property. The court has discretion to make a just-and-equitable distribution under RCW 26.09.080, which can deviate from a 50/50 split based on case-specific factors. The retirement order reflects the community-share allocation that the parties or the court settle on.

What is the Washington Department of Retirement Systems (DRS)?

DRS is the umbrella agency administering most Washington state and local government retirement systems, including PERS (Public Employees Retirement System), TRS (Teachers Retirement System), SERS (School Employees Retirement System), LEOFF (Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement System), PSERS (Public Safety Employees Retirement System), JRS (Judicial Retirement System), and WSPRS (Washington State Patrol Retirement System). DRS publishes a model dissolution order and offers pre-submission review. Each system has its own benefit structure, but they share the DRS dissolution-order framework.

What are Plan 2 and Plan 3 in Washington DRS?

Most DRS systems have multiple plans available to members based on hire date. Plan 2 is a traditional defined-benefit plan funded by member and employer contributions. Plan 3 is a hybrid: a defined-benefit component from employer contributions plus a defined-contribution component from member contributions invested in the member's choice of funds. Some systems also still have legacy Plan 1 members. The plan number determines the division mechanics: a Plan 3 dissolution order has to address both the DB and DC components separately.

How is LEOFF different from PERS?

LEOFF (Law Enforcement Officers' and Fire Fighters' Retirement System) covers Washington sworn police and firefighters. LEOFF 1 (pre-October 1977 members) and LEOFF 2 (October 1977 and later) have different benefit structures, vesting requirements, and dissolution-order treatment. LEOFF has its own DRS dissolution-order procedures, and certain disability and survivor mechanics are LEOFF-specific.

What is the Seattle City Employees' Retirement System (SCERS)?

SCERS covers most City of Seattle employees, separate from the DRS state systems. SCERS administers its own retirement plan with its own dissolution-order procedures. A dissolution order drafted to the DRS template will not be accepted by SCERS. Tacoma, Spokane, and certain other Washington cities also administer their own retirement systems separate from DRS.

Do Washington public-pension members pay Social Security?

Most do. Unlike many other states, Washington's PERS, TRS, and SERS members generally do pay Social Security on their public-pension-covered service. This reduces or eliminates the federal Windfall Elimination Provision and Government Pension Offset concerns that affect public-pension members in states like California, Massachusetts, or Illinois. LEOFF and certain WSPRS members may have different Social Security treatment depending on plan.

How long does DRS take to process a dissolution order?

DRS review typically takes 60 to 120 days after submission of an executed order, sometimes faster if the order matches the DRS model exactly. Pre-submission review (the order is sent in draft form for DRS to confirm acceptance before court signature) can shorten the post-execution timeline considerably and is the recommended approach for any DRS system.

What Washington case addresses dividing a pension in divorce?

In re Marriage of Bulicek (Wash. App. 1990) is a Washington decision on dividing a defined-benefit pension as community property. It addresses the time-rule approach and the treatment of certain post-divorce increases.

Washington divorce with a DRS, SCERS, or HERP plan?

Send the plan name, plan tier (if DRS), dates of marriage and separation, and the proposed community-share allocation. We confirm the order type, draft to the system's accepted language, and pre-submit where available.

Start a Case

Ready to start?

Start a New Case